Their Eyes Were Watching God, By Zora Hurston - 1119 Words

Who has power? In the book Their Eyes Were Watching God, men have the upper hand. while the women did not and were seen more as an obeying pet. Throughout the book Zora Hurston show men dominating Janie (main character) through her three marriages. Janie s first husband, Logan Killicks, uses his power to use her as a worker. Janie s second husband, Joe Starks, uses his power on Janie to make her obey him and is not allowed to talk to other men. Now Janie s last Husband, Teacake, uses his power to make Janie follow him wherever he goes. Why would Hurston portray men as powerful and women as powerless? Is it because this is the way our society depicts men? That men should be tough, fearless, and strong. Creating a tough interior†¦show more content†¦in Thomas). She had to make sure her house was fitting for her family. This because she is seen as incapable to do what a man can. Therefor women are seen powerless and powerless is defined as according to Merriam-Webster as  "lacking the authority or capacity to act.† She is also not allowed to cheat but a man was. Victorian men kept paramours, yet in any case they expected their wives or special woman to be dedicated whatever their own particular crimes. On the off chance that a woman took another man it was not allowed. In the event that it did get to be open learning she would be cut by society. But a man can do as he pleases. Also, It was a double-dealing period when connections were very counterfeit. Until late in the century in 1887 a wedded lady could claim no property. At that point in 1887 the Married Woman s Property Act gave ladies rights to possess her own particular property. Formerly her property, habitually inherited from her family, fit in with her spouse on marriage. She turned into the property of the man. Amid this time if a wife divided from her spouse she had no privileges of access to see her kids. A separated lady had no possibility of acknowledgement in the public arena on ce more. If a woman during the Victorian Era was rich (married a rich man or gained wealth through her family) she is different compared to a middle class woman and is

Essay on Search for Perfection in Toni Morrisons The...

Search for a Perfection in The Bluest Eye The concept of physical beauty and desire to conform to a prescribed definition of what is considered beautiful can destroy a persons life. In Toni Morrisons novel, The Bluest Eye, many characters are obsessed with attaining the idealist definition of what is considered beautiful. The characters of Geraldine, Pauline, and Pecola all believe that physical perfection leads to acceptance; however, it is the same belief that causes their personal downfalls and prevents them from recognizing their own inner beauty. Geraldines anxieties over wanting to comply with what others think is beautiful, damage her existence. For example, the character of Geraldine is so consumed with physical†¦show more content†¦She thinks his appearance is more important than her affection because she also wants to have a family that looks white. Geraldine thinks brushing her sons hair and oiling his skin will help to make his black features vanish. Geraldines concern and obsession over what is regarded by others as beautiful demolish her life. The character of Pauline tries so desperately to fit into societys typecast of beauty that she loses the ability to love herself for who she is as well as her ability to appreciate what she does have. For example, when Pauline is made to feel inferior by other black women, Morrison emphasizes, Pauline felt uncomfortable with the few black women she met. They were amused by her because she didnt straighten her hair. When she tried to make up her face as they did, it came off rather badly. Their goading glances and private snickers at her way of talking... and dressing developed in her desire for new clothes (Morrison 118). Pauline is aggravated because of her physical appearance. She feels ugly and wants to fit in with societys women. She tries fitting into what is thought by those around her to be the ideal characterization of beauty instead of accepting herself for whom she is. Pauline Breedloves insecurities only deepen as a result of her attempts to look a certain way. In ad dition, when Morrison explains how Pauline would rather be around nice things at work than at her ownShow MoreRelatedRacism in Toni Morrisons The Bluest Eye Essay1955 Words   |  8 Pagesequal.† In fact, Americans are praised for the so-called equality they possess. However, renowned author Toni Morrison sheds light on the sheltered and unspoken truth that everyone—to some extent—is racist. â€Å"Home† is a reflective essay in which Morrison explains that her triumphs against racist ideologies are evident throughout her various novels (â€Å"Home† 3). In Morrison’s first novel,  The Bluest Eye, instead of establishing a home where race does not matter—a home which she dreams of in her essay—sheRead MoreAnalysis Of The Great Gatsby And Morrison s The Bluest Eye 1874 Words   |  8 Pageswho know how to find it—the Emersonian genius, present in Ayn Rand’s Anthem, is by far more prone to salvation than that of t he coexisting counterpart who will reach an inevitable self-damnation, found in Fitzgerald’s The Great Gatsby and Morrison’s The Bluest Eye. Those who focus not on the method of acceptance into society but rather upon the idealism of the importance of solitude are capable of invention—â€Å"for only the individual can produce new ideas† (Isaacson 33). Prometheus, from Ayn Rand’s

Weakness of State Responsibility Samples †MyAssignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss about the Weakness of State Responsibility. Answer: Introduction The present question is based on the weak points that are found in case of state responsibility. Therefore, it can be said that the ultimate purpose of the report is to point out the international legal relationship and the various aspect of state responsibility. Before cominginto the point, it is important to understand the various scope and applicability of the principal regarding state responsibility[1]. The meaning of state responsibility can be depicted as follows: Under the international law, it has been stated that state should be held responsible for any wrongful act or any breach to the international obligations that are mentioned under the international law. The state responsibility indicates towards the violation of the legal norms set out byinternational law and the consequence of such violation[2]. Under the process of state responsibility types of legal rules are to be understood. The first one is primary rules that are also known as the substances rules and the other one is secondary rules that are comprised of issues of responsibility. An attempt has been made by these rules to establish the actions regarding the international wrongful acts, situations by which the acts of the officials and private individuals are attributed to the state and defences as against the international liability and the consequence of such liability[3]. It is a fact that the terms state responsibility denotes injuries faced by the enemy countries and the re ciprocal injuries suffered to the enemies . This process involves the relationship between the primary and secondary rules of law. The secondary issues can be gained by way of remedies and the primary issues can be understood by way of tackling the diplomatic protection[4]. Discussion The nature of the state responsibility was growing and it was become necessaryto codify the rules regarding the state responsibility and it was one of the most serious concern of the United Nation. After a hard work of 45 years the nature of state responsibility has become codified through International Law Commission. During the purification process of the state responsibility it becomes necessary to understand the nature of the state responsibility[5]. One of the popular and special report of International Law Commission, F.V.GARCIA of Cuba emphasize the chapter on the state responsibility regarding the injury caused by it to its alien enemy. However it has been observed that in the year 1961 when his membership was stopped his ideas and dolphins was denied by international legal Commission[6]. However, the areas of State responsibility are, for the first time, defined by Roberto Ago of Italy. He had emphasized on the distinction between the legal rules that are based on primary an d secondary rules and also made an attempt to define the organisational structure of state responsibility. An attempt to identify the outcomes of the bleachers regarding the international obligation was made by Gaetano Arangio Ruiz. The idea of this rapporteur has been taken into consideration in the year 1995 and the United Nations general assembly have adopted certain decisions regarding the progression of the state responsibility[7]. In the Law Commission report that was drafted in the year 2001, comprised of certain articles and article 19 of the Commission report was dealing with the provision regarding the state crimes[8]. Grounds of legal obligation Article 19 creates strong implication on the international Unity that can be breached by the wrongful act of a state if it failed to perform the legal obligations mentioned as a crime. It has been stated another article where it has been mentioned that certain acts can be regarded as International crime that are as follows: If an obligation has been violated that has important features regarding the international peace and security; A breach has essential importance against the safeguarding of the rights of self determination of people; If Breach has been made by a state regarding the obligation that has important effect on safeguarding the human being from slavery or genocide; If a breach has been made by the state regarding an obligation that has an effect on human environment and massive pollution to the atmosphere. Attribution It is to be determined that what action of a state can be attracted the provision of state responsibility. One thing is to be kept in mind that there should be a casual connection regarding the injury caused by the state and an official act attributable to the state[9]. It is mentioned under the article that the state should be responsible for every action taken by its officials or organs and the officials of the state will be held liable if it Ultra Vires the provisions of the International Law regarding the public safety or the human rights[10]. There are certain non state actors who play an important role regarding the violation of the international law. These non-states are Al Qaeda, and several non-governmental organisations. It has been observed that all the attributions made by those non-state organisationare creating serious impact on the international community as well as the international integrity to support the benefit of international legal structure. Defences It has been mentioned under the International Law Commission report that is a state held responsible for violation of the international rules it can defend himself under certain provisions of that report. This Grounds can be categorised as article 23 article 25 article 24 and article 21 and article 20. All the provisions are throwing light on the chapters like distress, Self defence, countermeasures and consent[11]. Consequence of breach It is of no doubt to state that violation of international rules is to be considered as one of the international trade that can weaken provision of the international unity and integrity. If a breach has been made as per the provision of article 19 of the International Law Commission report 2001, Saturn liabilities will be imposed on the respective state and that will affect the international community as a whole[12]. The application can be defined as reparation duties made by the state that is mentioned under article 31 of the International Law Commission report. The second entitlements can be defined as a creation of new rights for the NGOs states that has been mentioned under article 42 and 48 of the International Law Commission report. The word reparation means restitution of compensation made by the defendant state and the alien state will be getting much benefit so that they can prepare them self for the development of the standard in general. Provisions of ILC It has been mentioned under article 18 of the International Law Commission report that if our state is a list to coerce the other state regarding matters that has International importance can be fallen within the scope of the state responsibility. Chapter v of the report states certain defences regarding the Alleged state where they can be adopted certain defences regarding the state responsibility. It has been mentioned under article 20 of the report that is a valid consent can be taken by one state to another state and the wrongfulness has been done to that extent to remain within the limits of that consent the state will not be held liable for any such acts. Under article 21 of the report it has been mentioned that it can constitutes art and wrongful acts that violate the principle of international law if it can be done for the process of self-defence. Even under article 12 of the report it has been observed that if the law itself prescribed that a state can take steps against any alien enemy then also the state cannot be responsible for any wrong full at that ensure to the interest of the other states. Weak points: Several articles that were encrypted under the International Law Commission are weak in nature. Under the commission report, part four depicts the provision. It has been mentioned under Article 55 of the report states about the applicability of all the provisions of the commission report and certain limitations are also mentioned in this case. It has been stated that the provisions can only be applicable if the questionable act are governed by the other provision of the international law. It has been stated under the Article 56 that the rules mentioned here are not be able to apply in the matters that are not regulated by this Articles. The rules of the article are only applied to certain specific questions that are included within the periphery of the Article and not beyond to that. Relevant provision is also stated under Article 54 of ILC that the provisions of the Article does not does not take any lawful measures against any state regarding the breach made by a state and it could not able to repatriate the alleged state that intend to injure the interest of the state or the alien state. Conclusion Therefore, from the above mentioned statements it has been observed that certain acts that violate the international rules can be regarded as the state responsibility of the violation has been done by a state in general. There are certain grounds that have been mentioned under the various articles of the International Law Commission report regarding the breach international policies[13]. It has been stated that state responsibility arise only when the acts of the state harms the interest of an alien enemy. Article 19 of the International Law Commission report has stated that there are certain Grounds by which it can be determined that whether or state has been violated the principle of the legal policies or not. Beside this provision, there are certain other provisions that are mentioned under the report that identifies the inability of the report to take strong action against those states that are violated the principles of international law. It is required to implement certain step s so that the suggestion given by the ILC regarding the state responsibility should be imposed on the states that had violated the provisions of international law by affecting the interest of the enemy states. There are many points mentioned under a separate provision of the International Law Commission report 2001 that state should not misuse their position and they are not able to violate the principle of the international law. Reference: Akande, Dapo, and Antonios Tzanakopoulos. "The International Court of Justice and the Concept of Aggression." (2015). ARBITRATION, ADHOC, and I. CASE CONCERNING TERRITORIAL. "Decisions of International Courts and Tribunals."ICLQ57 (2008): 701-709. Bernhardt, Rudolf. "Encyclopedia of public international law." (2013). Byers, Michael. "Terrorism, the use of force and international law after 11 September."International Comparative Law Quarterly51.2 (2012): 401-414. Case, Nicaragua. "Case concerning military and paramilitary activities in and against Nicaragua."Judgement on the Merits(2014). Cohen, Harlan Grant, et al. "Introduction: Legitimacy and International Courts." (2017). Crawford, James, and Thomas D. Grant. "International Court of Justice."The Oxford Handbook on the United Nations(2017). De Brabandere, Eric. "The Use of Precedent and External Case Law by the International Court of Justice and the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea."The Law Practice of International Courts and Tribunals15.1 (2016): 24-55. Dinstein, Yoram.The conduct of hostilities under the law of international armed conflict. Cambridge University Press, 2016. Elias, Taslim.The international court of justice and some contemporary problems: essays on international law. Vol. 2. Springer Science Business Media, 2013. Hargrove, John Lawrence. "The Nicaragua Judgment and the Future of the Law of Force and Self-Defense."American Journal of International Law81.1 (2016): 135-143. Malintoppi, Loretta. "Fact Finding and Evidence Before the International Court of Justice (Notably in Scientific-Related Disputes)."Journal of International Dispute Settlement7.2 (2016): 421-444. MATTERS, MUTUAL ASSISTANCE IN CRIMINAL. "DECISIONS OF INTERNATIONAL COURTS AND TRIBUNALS."ICLQ59 (2010): 193-205. Wellens, Karel. "The International Court of Justice, Back to the Future: Keeping the Dream Alive."Netherlands International Law Review64.2 (2017): 193-212. Wi?niewski, Adam. "International Courts and Legalism in International Law."Polish Review of International and European Law(2017).

Myth of Niobe free essay sample

Whereas in plain text, that is what the myths suggests, the underlying meaning that Achilles is trying to convey is that he is able to regain his composure and humanity and that while it is important to grieve for the death of your love ones, its most important to stay sane and live life. The story that Achilles tells is after a small conflict that emerges between King Priam and himself once the king arrives in his tent. Once the king had made it safely to Achilless tent with the guidance of Hermes, he is instantly angered and flustered by Achilless tone and beating around the bush. He believes that since the great warrior had taken [the] first step and allowed [him]/To live and see the light of day (The Iliad, Book XXIV, 602-603), he was going to just hand over the body of Hector and let him leave. We will write a custom essay sample on Myth of Niobe or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Achilles then replies with a rageful comment implying that he is doing this not because he wants to but because A messenger came to [him]/ From Zeus my own natural mother, (The Iliad, Book XXIV, 606-607). The real first step in Achilless mind is not letting Priam live but instead opening his ears to the gods and following through with their will. This shows that he is once again living in fear of the gods and regaining his humanity and right state of mind like all other mortals do on a daily basis. The burning of offerings and construction of temples are not because mortals enjoy praising the gods, but because of their fear for them. Achilles, while born with godlike attributes, is still a mortal and as a result should be living in fear, and not act independent of his superiors on Mt. Olympus. In the story of Niobe, Achilles convinces King Priam that eating is important, even in the face of his beloved sons death. While on the surface, eating, a simple everyday task that is looked over by everyone, seems to be second nature; it is simple everyday tasks that keep us sane and living. Achilles knows this and is giving the king a simple yet important lesson. Priam as he later reveals that [he] had eaten nothing till now. (The Iliad, Book XXIV, Line 692) as well as his eyes have not closed since [his] son lost his life (The Iliad, Book XXIV line 686) implying that he has also hasnt slept. Sleep is another simple yet easily overlooked task that keeps all living beings alive and energetic and is a simple necessity of life, same with eating. In the story, Niobe remembers to eat even in the face of the death of her 12 children, and it shows that she has given up on what she had been holding on to and is able to focus on her life and what she wants to do with it. In Priams case, even though his favorite and most important son is dead, he must regain his composure and fill the role as the King and ready his city for war as he can grieve for his son after his own death. Priam must become himself again, put his city first for the next days as he has the rest of eternity to grieve for his son similar to how Niobe broods on [her] sorrows (The Iliad, Boox XXIV 668).. Achilles is fully aware of Priams situation know[s] Priam, inside out (The Iliad, Book XXIV, line 608-609) ,and knows the exact emotional state that Priam is in. He realizes that he himself is the killer of the Kings son and the mere presence of Priam shows that he has to have overcome a huge part of himself to bring the fortune he has to the Greek camp in offer for his sons body. With that being said, the way Achilles tells this story is very strategic and clever. He starts off with a relaxing comment, assuring Priam of his sons bodys safety and that he has let him go and the continues with the myth. At the end of his myth, he leaves Priam with Well, so should we, old sir,/ Remember to eat. You can mourn your son later/ When you bring him to Troy. You owe him many tears. (The Iliad, Book XXIV, Line 668-671). In addition to the regaining of humanity that is completely necessary in Priams situation, Achilles is telling him to be calm, and not do anything he will regret. This is because Priam is currently in the middle of Greek camp and he understands the hate and the anger he has stored up for Achilles and his army and any sign of aggression will surely result in him losing his life. He assures Priam that his army, along with him will have [an] armistice (The Iliad, Book XXIV, Line 719) until the twelfth day [when they] fight, if [they] must (The Iliad, Book XXIV, Line 717). Achilles shows through his choice and placement of words that he acknowledges Priams pain and tries to advise him against any regretful decisions that he may have. In the morning after, Hermes comes to Priam and reminds him of the situation he is in, the king of Troy sleeping in the middle of the Greek camp. The fact that King Priam suddenly feels afraid shows that Achilles has instilled the instinct of fear, a common trait of mortals back into his life which shows that he is regaining his humanity. Just before the funeral of Hector, Priam speaks to his people and tells them a similar message to what Achilles told him which was to have no fear of an Argive ambush. (The Iliad, Book XXIV, line 834) and ready themselves for a feast and the funeral of his beloved son. He attempts to calm his people, and tell them that even though the end is near, and the war is the number one priority, the people of Troy must come together and [assemble] for a glorious feast (The Iliad, Book XXIV, line 858). At the end of the day, Achilless act of kindness and compassion helps him regain his humanity in more then one way as he gives an enemy of his what he would never have done. He has given up his anger and grief for Patrocluss death and not let anger cloud his judgement. By giving up Hectors body because the gods told him so,he has regained his fear for the gods and acknowledged their strength and ultimately regained his own humanity as a mortal.